Scope and authority
State the intended workflow, the decisions the tool may support, and the actions it must never take without human approval.
A useful vendor review is more than a feature list. It documents the work the tool will touch, the data it will see, the decisions a person must still own, and what happens when the output is wrong or the vendor changes.
State the intended workflow, the decisions the tool may support, and the actions it must never take without human approval.
Record what information enters the system, who can access it, where it is retained, and which integrations or permissions are active.
Define who checks important outputs, what evidence they review, how exceptions are escalated, and how the review is recorded.
Decide how errors, vendor changes, outages, and termination are handled before the tool becomes part of a recurring process.
The questions below are a practical starting point for an accounting firm, advisory practice, or other small professional-services team. Keep the answers tied to a specific use case rather than approving a vendor in the abstract.
Run the free review to organize the first pass. When the need is a reusable set of registers, review records, authority boundaries, and incident questions, the current Ops Control HQ paid paths are available below.
This checklist is operational guidance, not legal advice, an audit opinion, a compliance certification, or a guarantee of regulatory compliance. Teams remain responsible for independent review and professional advice where appropriate.